The Orissa High Court has clarified an important procedural aspect under GST law regarding the availability of writ remedies when appellate forums become operational. The ruling highlights the importance of following statutory appeal mechanisms once they are available.

Case Overview

• Case Title: Ghanashyama Sahoo v. Commissioner of CT & GST

  Need help with this? Talk to Goyal Raj Kumar & Associates →

• Court: High Court of Orissa

• Citation: W.P. (C) No. 16823 of 2025

Facts of the Case

• A GST demand order was passed under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 for the period July 2017 to March 2018.

• The order was upheld by the First Appellate Authority on 28.11.2023.

• The petitioner intended to file a second appeal under Section 112, but:

  Need help with this? Talk to Goyal Raj Kumar & Associates →

  • The GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) was not constituted at that time

• Due to the absence of an effective appellate remedy, the petitioner approached the High Court through a writ petition.

• Subsequently, the Government issued notifications and advisories prescribing timelines for filing appeals once GSTAT became functional.

Key Legal Issue

Whether a writ petition can be continued when the statutory appellate remedy (GSTAT) becomes available after being non-functional earlier.

Court’s Decision

The High Court held that:

• Writ jurisdiction may be invoked only when no effective alternative remedy exists

• Once the GSTAT becomes functional, the petitioner must:

  • Avail the statutory appellate remedy under Section 112

• The petitioner was directed to:

  • File an appeal within the notified timelines issued by the Government

  • Comply with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 112(8)

• The Court further directed that:

  • The GSTAT shall entertain the appeal if filed in accordance with law

  • The writ petition was disposed of without examining the merits

Relevant Legal Provisions

• Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 – Demand for tax involving fraud, suppression, etc.

• Section 112 of the CGST Act, 2017 – Appeal to Appellate Tribunal

• Section 112(8) – Mandatory pre-deposit:

  • 100% of admitted tax

  • 10% of disputed tax (subject to limits)

Key Takeaways for Taxpayers

• Writ petitions are not a substitute for statutory appeals

• Temporary absence of appellate forums may justify writs, but:

  • Such relief is not permanent

• Once GSTAT is operational:

  • Taxpayers must strictly follow appeal procedures and timelines

• Ensure readiness for:

  • Pre-deposit requirements

  • Timely filing of appeals

Conclusion

This ruling reinforces the principle that statutory remedies take precedence once available. Taxpayers should stay updated on GSTAT developments and ensure compliance with appeal timelines and procedural requirements to safeguard their legal rights.

For expert guidance on this topic, contact your tax professional today.